UPLIFT LOGO
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Email this to someone
0

The Paris Response: Revenge or Forgiveness?

By Ervin Laszlo and Barbara Marx-Hubbard on Monday November 23rd, 2015

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Email this to someone
 
0

Why breaking the cycle of violence is the only option for humanity

An eye for an eye ends up making the whole world blind.
– Mahatma Gandhi

Amongst the grief and confusion of terror attacks lies a question that is confronting yet critical to our future: what can we do – personally and collectively – to break the cycle of violence?

With climate change and other global crises staring us in the face, we would seem to have no choice but to unify and turn our attention to fighting our battles together. If we don’t, we may not have an Earth to fight over at all.

The following is a statement in response to the Paris Attacks by two elders and pioneering visionaries of the Conscious Evolution movement, Dr. Ervin Laszlo and Barbara Marx Hubbard. It is written on behalf of the Club of Budapest, Foundation for Conscious Evolution, Greenheart International, The Hague Center, The Goi Peace Foundation, and The Global Consciousness Project.

Responding to terror with songs of peace

Learning to understand… and forgive

“There is a well-known saying in France that the French people and all people on this conflict-ridden planet would do well to take to heart. Tout comprendre c’est tout pardonner. To understand all is to forgive all. To understand is to forgive.

Can one forgive the killing of hundreds of innocent people? There is an emotional, gut-reaction that says no, this is unforgivable. Yet there is another answer that tells us that if we understand why these murderous events take place we can also forgive them. To forgive is not to give in, nor to forget, but to learn how to overcome and ultimately eliminate them.

Can we understand why the Paris attacks took place; understand them not as solely economic, political and religious conflicts but as a consequence of the nature of our shared existence in the contemporary world? Let us attempt a deeper understanding. Let us see ourselves as members of one family – the Human Family. There are no “others” in this family, just “us”.

Consider, then, the situation facing this family today. We are a species on the brink of self-initiated self-destruction and perhaps extinction, killing each other for achieving goals that do not change the course on which we find ourselves. We are on course to collide with a giant Iceberg while we fight for a privileged position on what may be the deck of the Titanic.

Alt text hereJe Suis Planet Earth / I Am Planet Earth

Steering the Earth around the iceberg called Climate Change

We can call Earth a spaceship named Titanic, and the Iceberg ahead Climate Change. If our vessel does not change course, the collision ahead will make it impossible for all 7.4 billion of us to survive. Can just some of us survive and not all? Would we not unleash the kind of conflict and violence of which today’s attacks are a tragic but limited foretaste?

How many millions, or billions, would have to disappear from the face of the Earth for the rest of us to live? And would there be a “rest of us” altogether? We could destroy the conditions for all higher forms of life on Earth, and if the planet heats up and becomes arid like a desert — as Mars is today — the chances of existence would be foreclosed for all higher forms of life.

We can also call the Iceberg ahead Global Breakdown. We have serious and rapidly growing existential problems facing us in addition to the threat of an unfavorably and perhaps catastrophically altered climate. A few of us have great wealth and power, while most of us are abjectly poor and powerless. The less privileged among us are increasingly frustrated and some invoke a higher mission to justify a violent struggle for a better life, or just bare existence.

However, violent conflict and murderous acts are a misguided, unproductive, and wrong response to today’s problems. This should be clear, but it should also be clear that the response to today’s problems cannot be more of the same. What would it do for us if we took revenge and respond to terror with terror, violence with violence, as some of our political and military leaders want to do? Would we not just hasten the encounter of our planetary spaceship with the double Iceberg ahead?

Alt text hereThe Paris Response: filling bullet holes with roses

Can forgiveness break the cycle of war and violence?

Today’s world is still dominated by wars and armed conflicts. The combined direct military expenditures of the world’s nation-states totaled over $1.776 Trillion dollars in 2014, and the ongoing wars and massive loss of life in the Middle East have generated the movement spearheaded by ISIS as well as the Syrian Refugee crisis that now engulfs Europe and spreads to other continents.

The response of the big powers with more attacks, war and violence will not either reduce or end these threats. Quite the contrary. It will only exacerbate the growing cycle of violence and expand the theater of conflict to cities and countries worldwide.

Forgiveness is a better response. It does not mean staying with the status quo, nor failing to act to change it. It is to act like a presumably intelligent species would act in an interdependent and seriously endangered planet: with empathy and insight, shared vision and common resolve.

We shall either hang together with understanding and solidarity, or will hang separately with our rancor and revenge. Conflicts are continually erupting in today’s world: we keep fighting among ourselves. Some of our conflicts engender major violence, and the consequences spread across the face of the Earth.

Alt text hereHow do we shift from revenge to forgiveness?

Realizing we are all in this together

Others enter into the conflicts, intending to help some factions to overpower the others. Those who are threatened by these interventions do everything they can to stop them. They are do not hesitate to use all the means at their disposal to achieve this goal, including misguided but still effective fanaticism.

Yet these people are not the devil, nor are they pure evil. They are desperate members of the human family whose sense of family has been overwhelmed by their abject condition. In regard to losing their sense of family they are not different from those of us who come into the fight brandishing arms and wielding their powers of destruction.

Continuing to help some of us against some others among us only exacerbates the conflicts and spreads the fighting. This deflects our attention from recognizing that the fight we are engaged in is on the deck of the Titanic — and that there is a double Iceberg ahead. What are we to do?

If we choose revenge as the way to proceed, future archaeologists visiting from another planet will discover that there was once a civilization on Earth, but it disappeared when the inhabitants made the planet inhospitable to life. They will not know whether the inhabitants had recognized the problem and tried to change course while they could.

Alt text hereCarrying the Earth on our shoulders

Collectively resolving to maintain life on Earth

We, the inhabitants of this planet Earth, must wake up and steer another course. Communication based on understanding, instead of eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth is the indicated course. We need to try it, before our problems overwhelm us.

Paris has become the venue for a “nearly” (even if sadly not entirely) unprecedented act of violence. It will soon be the venue for another, and this time entirely unprecedented event: the attempt of the leaders of the world to come together to keep humanity alive and flourishing on the planet: the United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP 21, to take place in Paris from November 30 to December 11.

Let us remember Paris as the place where the resolve was born to maintain life and civilization on Earth, and not where that resolve was dissipated before it could even be born.”

Sign the Paris Response statement here and add your name to the call for change based on Peace and Forgiveness

Dr. Ervin Laszlo is generally recognized as the founder of systems philosophy and general evolution theory. His work in recent years has centered on the formulation and development of the “Akasha Paradigm,” the new conception of cosmos, life and consciousness emerging at the forefront of the contemporary sciences.

Barbara Marx Hubbard has been a leading voice for innovative change in the world for the past 40 years. As a visionary author, speaker, social architect and co-founder and president of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution, she posits that humanity now, as never before, is on the threshold of a quantum leap.

How do you feel about this article? Join the conversation.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Email this to someone

Words By Ervin Laszlo and Barbara Marx-Hubbard

Originally posted on Avaaz

 

Related

A Letter of Peace

Nobody is born a terrorist

Nobody is Born a Terrorist

Being Peace in Every Moment

Featured

Why Our Understanding of Darwin’s Theory is Wrong

Simple Self-Soothing Practices for Finding Calm in Turmoil

A Practical Guide to Fully ‘Owning’ Your Life

Popular

Subscribe to UPLIFT

UPLIFT is dedicated to telling the new story of inspired co-creation.

Get free updates and news about UPLIFT events and films.

channels

Yoga
Wellness
Consciousness
Inspiration

UPLIFT

the yoga channel

http://uplift.yoga

follow UPLIFT on   

references

comments

Join the Conversation

3 Comments on "The Paris Response: Revenge or Forgiveness?"

avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
wpDiscuz
UPLIFT Logo