The Taoist View of the Universe

By Alan Watts on Friday January 8th, 2016

Alan Watts describes the Taoist principles which keep Life in Balance

At the very roots of Chinese thinking and feeling there lies the principle of polarity, which is not to be confused with the ideas of opposition or conflict. In the metaphors of other cultures, light is at war with darkness, life with death, good with evil, and the positive with the negative, and thus an idealism to cultivate the former and be rid of the latter flourishes throughout much of the world.

To the traditional way of Chinese thinking this is as incomprehensible as an electric current without both positive and negative poles, for polarity is the principle that plus and minus, north and south, are different aspects of one and the same system, and that the disappearance of either one of them would be the disappearance of the system.

Alan WattsAlan Watts.

Linear Ideology

People who have been brought up in the aura of Christian and Hebrew aspirations find this frustrating, because it seems to deny any possibility of progress, an ideal which flows from their linear (as distinct from cyclic) view of time and history. Indeed, the whole enterprise of Western technology is “to make the world a better place” – to have pleasure without pain, wealth without poverty, and health without sickness.

We have been interfering with a complex system of relationships which we do not understand, and the more we study its details, the more it eludes us by revealing still more details to study. As we try to comprehend and control the world it runs away – from us. Instead of chafing at this situation, a Taoist would ask what it means. What is that which always retreats when pursued? Answer: yourself.

Inseperable from selfTaoists view the universe as inseparable from themselves.

Idealists (in the moral sense of the word) regard the universe as different and separate from themselves – that is, as a system of external objects which needs to be subjugated.

Taoists view the universe as the same as, or inseparable from, themselves so that Lao-tzu could say, “Without leaving my house, I know the whole universe.”

This implies that the art of life is more like navigation than warfare, for what is important is to understand the winds, the tides, the currents, the seasons, and the principles of growth and decay, so that one’s actions may use them and not fight them.

In this sense, the Taoist attitude is not opposed to technology per se. Indeed, the Chuang-tzu writings are full of references to crafts and skills perfected by this very principle of “going with the grain.” The point is therefore that technology is destructive only in the hands of people who do not realize that they are one and the same process as the universe.

From Progress to Process

Our overspecialization in conscious attention and linear thinking has led to neglect, or ignore-ance, of the basic principles and rhythms of this process, of which the foremost is polarity.

Male FemaleThe masculine and the feminine principals.

In Chinese, the two poles of cosmic energy are yang (positive) and yin (negative), associated with the masculine and the feminine, the firm and the yielding, the strong and the weak, the light and the dark, the rising and the falling, heaven and earth, and they are even recognized in such everyday matters as cooking as the spicy and the bland.

Thus the art of life is not seen as holding to yang and banishing yin, but as keeping the two in balance, because there cannot be one without the other.

When regarding them as the masculine and the feminine, the reference is not so much to male and female individuals as to characteristics which are dominant in, but not confined to, each of the two sexes. The male individual must not neglect his female component, nor the female her male. Thus Lao-tzu says:

Knowing the male but keeping the female, one becomes a universal stream. Becoming a universal stream, one is not separated from eternal virtue.

Male and female unityBecoming a universal stream.

The yang and the yin are principles, not men and women, so that there can be no true relationship between the affectedly tough male and the affectedly flimsy female. The key to the relationship between yang and yin is called hsiang sheng, mutual arising or inseparability. As Lao-tzu puts it:

When everyone knows beauty as beautiful,
there is already ugliness;
When everyone knows good as goodness,
there is already evil.

“To be” and “not to be” arise mutually;
Difficult and easy are mutually realized;
Long and short are mutually contrasted;
High and low are mutually posited;
Before and after are in mutual sequence.

They are thus like the different, but inseparable, sides of a coin, the poles of a magnet, or pulse and interval in any vibration. There is never the ultimate possibility that either one will win over the other, for they are more like lovers wrestling than enemies fighting.

Yin yang water fireBeing and non-being are mutually generative and mutually supportive.

Being and Non-being

It is difficult in our logic to see that being and non-being are mutually generative and mutually supportive, for it is the great and imaginary terror of Western man that nothingness will be the permanent universe. We do not easily grasp the point that the void is creative, and that being comes from non-being as sound from silence and light from space.

Thirty spokes unite at the wheel’s hub;
It is the center hole that makes it useful.
Shape clay into a vessel;
It is the space within that makes it useful.
Cut out doors and windows for a room;
It is the holes which make it useful.
Therefore profit comes from what is there;
Usefulness from what is not there.

This space is not “just nothing” as we commonly use that expression, for I cannot get away from the sense that space and my awareness of the universe are the same, and call to mind the words of the Chan (Zen) Patriarch Hui-neng, writing eleven centuries after Lao-tzu:

The capacity of mind is broad and huge, like the vast sky. Do not sit with a mind fixed on emptiness. If you do you will fall into a neutral kind of emptiness. Emptiness includes the sun, moon, stars, and planets, the great earth, mountains and rivers, all trees and grasses, bad men and good men, bad things and good things, heaven and hell; they are all in the midst of emptiness. The emptiness of human nature is also like this.

BonsaiThe somethings and the nothings.

Thus the yin-yang principle is that the somethings and the nothings, the ons and the offs, the solids and the spaces, as well as the wakings and the sleepings and the alternations of existing and not existing, are mutually necessary.

Yang and yin are in some ways parallel to the (later) Buddhist view of form and emptiness, of which the Heart Sutra says,

That which is form is just that which is emptiness and that which is emptiness is just that which is form.

The yin-yang principle is not, therefore, what we would ordinarily call a dualism, but rather an explicit duality expressing an implicit unity.

How do you feel about this article? Join the conversation.



Five reasons to meditate

Five Reasons to Meditate


Thousands of Israeli and Palestinian Women Unite


Let’s give Kids Yoga

Subscribe to UPLIFT

UPLIFT is dedicated to telling the new story of inspired co-creation.

Get free updates and news about UPLIFT events and films.

How will my data be used?



26 Responses to The Taoist View of the Universe

  1. We invent the opposites with our mind. Think of God and the Devil comes to mind–its opposite. Think good and bad appears. We live in duality because we think it.

  2. while living on earth it looks as if our solar system is consciously designed in entire known universe to sustain life for every order of living organism on this planet, this makes me wonder to integrate the Creator with the creation, it is therefore adequate to say explicit Unity expressing implicit duality. Yang and Yin being two opposite forces ascribed as virtue and vice spiritually and empirically as physical quantities sustaining the fabric of Time & Space. As the level of Opacity obscures light, likewise nature of vice obscures virtue accordingly. The knowledge and consciousness has been evolving to guide humans to keep balance while pursuing minimal opacity ore reign of goodness (Yang) all across the social fabric.

    • Though I currently am wrought in this , I also become oblivious. Lord knows when I am immersed for evermore.

  3. Of all the religious and spiritual iconography, the Taoist Yin/Yang encircled symbol speaks more to the unity of existence than any other. I once read that it is also the earliest icon, having been found in a cave, carved on antler bones, that were carbon dated to 14,000 years ago. Unfortunately, I am unable to “unE-air-th this factoid again. hahaha


  5. Definitely a proponent of the teachings of Lao Tzu, and thankful for the reminder of “walking the razors edge”.

  6. Your writing is a necessary corrective to the view that humanity is now evolving to a higher spiritual level.

  7. When I read the words in the article

    “We have been interfering with a complex system of
    relationships which we do not understand, and the more we study its details,
    the more it eludes us by revealing still more details to study.”

    it reminded me where I had made a remark elsewhere on Facebook that the Universe and the reality around us could be of the nature of fractals. The deeper and more involute we go, new and new coils seem to get revealed.

  8. My favorite line is : “That which is form is just that which is emptiness and that which is emptiness is just that which is form.” — dichotomy the key to unlocking the verse uni or not

    • You are certainly right. But if you go to see, in this magnificence of Creation and magnificence of the Universe, tiny individual achievements seem so minute that in the great grandeur, as some sort of deference to the Supreme, this can be ignored.

      I’m sorry to be appearing to be striking a different note on your comment, but I wish to bring to your attention that in the ancient past of Indian history, fantastic creative efforts were presented to the society anonymously. In a way it was to reduce man’s importance in the grandeur of the Divine.

      I Translate from a popular Kannada poet (Kannada = one of the languages of India)

      “Who is the first man who saw the possibility of food in raw rice grains?/
      Who is the first man who was the pioneer of the power of alphabets/
      The world has not kept a count of its great pioneers/
      Do you aspire for glory, Mankuthimma?”


      • Hi Deepak,
        Stumbled upon this page today and loved your comment. Can you please point me to the kannada version of this poem. I would really appreciate it. Thanks in advance.

Leave a reply